The program pays benefits to more than 75 million people and spends more than it collects in tax revenue. In 2033, Social Security is projected to take in $2 trillion and spend $2.4 trillion as the U.S. population ages. Researchers and aging advocates have urged Congress to act, but lawmakers have not settled on a clear solvency plan.
Candidates in closely watched Senate races often focused on affordability, though Social Security featured in their campaign promises. Many Democrats backed raising or eliminating the payroll-tax cap on high earners. Republican candidates more often emphasized protecting current beneficiaries, reducing fraud or forming bipartisan commissions, without endorsing a specific plan. Other proposals included an investment fund and smaller annual benefit adjustments.
Among the winning candidates cited, Sherrod Brown of Ohio, Troy Jackson of Maine and Josh Turek of Iowa supported removing the cap; Adam Hamilton of Kansas backed raising it but had not endorsed eliminating it. Abdul El-Sayed of Michigan also proposed ending taxes on Social Security benefits, while James Talarico of Texas called for eliminating the cap on earnings above $400,000 and encouraging employer pensions. Several candidates also backed expanding home-based care or supporting family caregivers.





Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!